Former President Azad Kashmir, Sardar Abdul Qayyum Khan has termed the Kashmir conflict ‘most dangerous and complex’ issue in the world between two nuclear states and said the international community needs to bring about a peaceful solution to the problem.
The leader of the Muslim Conference was in Colombo on invitation by Pugwash, an International Non-governmental Organization from Pugwash, Nova Scotia, Canada involved in disarmament and conflict resolution. In an interview, Sardar Qayyum said the voice of the people in held Kashmir is in favor of acceding with Pakistan.
Representatives of both parts of Kashmir attended the conference the purpose of which was to create a congenial environment for conflict resolution. Speaking of the overall involvement of Pakistan in assisting the people of Kashmir in solving the long standing issue of self-determination, he said that Pakistan government is doing its maximum and lending diplomatic, political and moral support.
He maintained, “While Kashmiris feel akin to Pakistan, due to many similarities including that of ideology, Indian government is stuck up since they are alien in Kashmir.” Citing the ceasefire as the most significant move, towards solving this long standing issue between the two countries, he proposed attention to immediate issues, as the best path to tread in bringing a peaceful solution.
He cited freedom of movement between the two countries as an expressway to bring about a peaceful solution, suggesting that the borders should be maintained in a similar manner to those between European countries. He said that Kashmiris are of the unanimous view that the government of India should be requested to step up efforts to bring a solution to the conflict, by simplifying the procedure for the general public to interact with each other.
Taking the bus service between the two territories as an example, he pointed out that thousands are awaiting permission to travel due to stringent restrictions. Simplifying the travel restrictions to holding a personal identity card and allowing trade without restriction, “should raise the level of (civilian) participation immediately,” he said.
Speaking about the efforts of the Kashmiri leaders of both sides, he said that the role of the Kashmir is critical in solving the issue. Sardar Qayyum said the civilians in Kashmir are under the worst kind of pressure, with the younger generation almost on the verge of destruction.
India should display more sincerity towards held Kashmir issue: Bazaz
Jammu and Kashmir Democratic Forum Chief Pundits Bhushan Bazaz has said that the burning issue of Kashmir could only be solved if India displays more sincerity toward the issue.
Addressing a meeting of party workers, he said the Kashmir issue should be solved within defined time frame. Bazaz said the issue could be solved only if India displays more sincerity added, “The recent efforts by the two countries on Kashmir are laudable. But for a final settlement, India and Pakistan will have to be more sincere and set a time frame for it.”
He said that some elements in India and Pakistan have developed vested interests into the non-resolution of Kashmir issue and subsequent violence. He maintained that such elements did not want the violence should be stopped as their livelihood depends on the bloodshed,” he said.
Kashmir resolution vital for peace in SA: APHC (AJK)
Urging the international community to play its role to help resolve Kashmir dispute for the sake of peace and stability in South Asia, the convener of Hurriyat Conference (M), AJK chapter, Yousuf Naseem has said the longstanding dispute should be resolved amicably in line with the wishes and aspirations of the people of Jammu and Kashmir so as to ensure peace, progress and prosperity in the region.
Naseem made these remarks while talking to the Canadian Acting High Commissioner, Johan J Moore at Canadian High Commission in Pakistan.
three member delegation led by Naseem briefed the Canadian diplomat about latest situation prevailing in Jammu and Kashmir, gave him a detailed account of human rights situation in the area.
They added that despite the ongoing peace process between India and Pakistan there was no let up in the human rights abuses. They pointed out that illegally detained Kashmiris were languishing in jails without any trial.
Referring to India‘s intransigence, the Kashmiri representatives termed it as a major hurdle and consequently there was no substantial progress on Kashmir issue so for as the resolution of the dispute is concerned.
Terming the four point formula given by President of Pakistan, General Pervez Musharraf as significant development to address the core issue of Kashmir, the delegates said that India should grab the opportunity to get the problem resolved so that peace and prosperity could harmonize in the subcontinent
India to give up rigid stance to bring peace in Valley: Geelani
Chairman of Tehreek-e-Hurriyat Syed Ali Geelani has said that peace in Held Kashmir is impossible till Government of India does not give up its rigid stance on Kashmir issue.
Talking to media after his re-election as a Chairman for the party, he observed that Indian Government should bring flexibility in its attitude towards the solution of Kashmir and that is the sole way to peace in Held Valley, he added. To developments in Pakistan, he said these are not in the interests of Kashmiris according to him, peace is impossible till Government of India does not give up its rigid stance
He ridiculed the statement of Defense Minister of India Mr. AK Antony that army was not an occupation force. Geelani alleged that security forces have resorted to worst kind of atrocities on people. He viewed that the life and honor of the masses is not safe in presence of security forces. The separatist leader in this connection referred to the incidents at Kangan, Bandipora and Kunan Poshpora






The debate on Kashmir can be discussed equally vociferously under two opetions. One option is that of annexing it to Pakistan because it is full of Muslims and rid of millions of Kashmiri Pundits and other Hindus who were killed or driven out of their own homeland. This option will be naturally preferred by Pakistanis and overwhelming number of Muslims, because of an intrinsically seditious mentality of Islam which the Madrasas and the Mullas have instilled in the youth. The second option is for Kashmir to continue under the status quo, with a portion of it grabbed by force by Pakistan at time of Greater India’s partition and the other portion remaining with India in conformity with the accesssion made by the then Hindu ruler of Kashmir. The second option, desirably with the re-merging of Pakistan-occupied Kashmir with Indian Kashmir, but without such remerger if Pakistan blackmails India with a nuclear war, is thee correct option. India has a Muslim population which exceeds that of even Pakistan which is spread in many States of India, and these Muslims continued within India even though they were given the option to go to the then newly formed Pakistan (1947 and India’s Muslims were taken to give more importance to living decently in a traditionally religion-tolerant Hindudom, than go to Pakistan and eat religion for food and die because of idiotic hatred as between Sunnis and Shias which is the fact of today’s historical truth of Pakistan. The second option is ruled out, because in the alternative, the first will need to be accepted. But if the Indian Kashmir is merged with the other Kashmir to become integral part of Pakistan, then, there will be religious riots started all over India to expel the Muslims to go to Pakistan, which will mean a human bloodbath never witnessed in history. If Kashmiri Muslims, either all of them or even most of them, senselessly stick to their idiotic medieval ideas of Islam as if that were the bread and butter of life even in modern times, India will rather prefer to challenge Pakistan a war fought with nuclear weapons, even if it means mutual annihilation. Right thinking people with even a modicum of commonsense will therefore continue with the present status quo, merely as a compromise with Pakistan, although a ‘full’ Kashmir within Indian Union has much better chances of economic and social progress, than even a portion of it remaining under a constantly strife-stricken Mullas-dominated Pakistan.